See actual injury payouts made to Washington D.C. car accident victims. Find cases similar to yours.

More than 35 people suffer fatal injuries in Washington D.C. crashes each year, and the numbers continue to climb.¹

The District of Columbia has a no-fault car accident rule, to the extent that accident victims can choose to rely on their own auto insurance for injury coverage, no matter who caused the accident. Or, they may choose to file a liability claim or lawsuit against the at-fault driver.

The average car accident settlement in Washington D.C. for a moderate injury claim is $37,750. Average payouts range from $5,564 for minor injuries to $315,000 for severe injuries.

Average Washington D.C. Car Accident Settlement Amounts

We analyzed a group of injury lawsuits filed in Washington D.C. courts by car accident victims. The group reflects a variety of rear-end collisions, from minor fender-benders to severe collisions involving heavy trucks. All plaintiffs received a payout from a jury verdict, bench verdict, or an out-of-court settlement.

Million-dollar payouts are rare. The study group contains a severe spinal cord injury case with a $1,500,000 payout that was not included in the averages so as not to skew them artificially high.

Neck and back injuries are the most common type of injuries suffered in all kinds of motor vehicle accidents, followed by head injuries.

Average Payout by Severity of Injury
Minor Injury	$5,564
Moderate Injury	$37,750
Severe Injury	$315,000
Payout Range by Severity of Injury
Minor Injury	$883 – $11,000
Moderate Injury	$15,000 - $75,000
Severe Injury	$100,000 - $1,500,000

How Car Accident Settlements Are Calculated

Insurance adjusters, lawyers, and juries generally look the the severity and scope of a crash victim’s injuries to determine the settlement value of a claim.

You have 60 days to decide to make a PIP claim under your own policy. If you do not use your PIP coverage, you can make a liability claim against the at-fault driver’s insurance policy

Estimating a Payout for Minor Injuries

An easy way to estimate a fair settlement for minor to moderate car accident injuries is the multiple method. Add up all your economic damages like medical bills, lost wages, and out-of-pocket expenses. Then add one to three times that amount to account for your pain and suffering.

A multiple of one is reasonable for minor injuries. A multiple of two or three is appropriate for injuries that had a bigger impact on your life after the accident.

What If I Have PIP Coverage?

Under Washington D.C. law, insurance companies must offer no-fault Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage. PIP is not mandatory. No-fault PIP coverage will cover your eligible expenses no matter who caused the accident.

If you choose to take PIP benefits, you are generally prohibited from filing a lawsuit against the at-fault driver. You have 60 days after an accident to decide if you will use your own PIP coverage, or pursue a claim against the at-fault driver.

Washington D.C. PIP can cover:

• Medical treatment and rehabilitation expenses up to $50,000 to $100,000
• Wage loss benefits up the $12,000 to $24,000
• Funeral benefits up to $4,000

PIP does not pay for property damage or pain and suffering.

You can estimate a PIP payout by adding up your medical bills, out-of-pocket medical expenses, and lost wages.

Exceeding the No-Fault Threshold

Injuries exceed Washington D.C.’s no-fault threshold when medical expenses are more than your PIP coverage limit, or the injuries result in disfigurement or physical impairment.

Severe injuries that exceed the no-fault threshold are best handled by an experienced personal injury attorney.

An attorney will prove that your injuries meet the threshold criteria, pursue liability coverage from the at-fault driver’s insurer, and gather evidence supporting your damages, including compensation for your physical and emotional pain and suffering.

Other factors that affect injury payouts in Washington D.C.:

• Shared Fault – Washington D.C. is a pure contributory negligence state, meaning car accident victims are barred from seeking injury compensation if they share any blame for the accident. There’s an exception for pedestrians or “vulnerable users,” who can make a claim so long as they are less the 50 percent to blame for their injuries.
• Auto Policy Limits – All motor vehicles registered in Washington D.C. must carry auto liability insurance of at least $25,000 per person/$50,000 per accident, and $10,000 for property damage.
• Multiple Claimants – When more than one person is injured in the same collision, there might not be enough liability coverage to fully compensate all victims.
• Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Coverage – Washington D.C. requires auto policies to have mandatory uninsured motorist (UM) coverage equal to the liability limits. Insurers must also offer underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage equal to the policy’s liability limits, however the policyholder may reject the UIM offer.
• Commercial Policies – Insurance policies for commercial or governmental vehicles like mail trucks and buses carry higher liability limits than personal auto policies. Higher limits can mean higher payouts for severe injury claims.
• Punitive Damages – Washington D.C. case law only allows punitive damages when the jury finds clear and convincing evidence of actual malice or intent to hurt the victim.

Frequently Asked Questions

Minor Injury Case Examples

Minor car accident injuries are usually soft-tissue injuries like cuts, bruises, scrapes, and muscle sprains or strains. Victims might be too stiff and sore to work for a few days, but should fully heal within a month.

Small Verdict for Disputed Injuries

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck, back and shoulder injuries
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $883
Case Summary: Plaintiff was driving an SUV with Plaintiff 2 as a passenger. They were stopped at a lighted intersection when they were rear-ended by a vehicle driven by Defendant’s car. Plaintiff2’s claims for economic ($ 2,989) and non-economic damages were dismissed at trial and the case proceeded on plaintiff’s claims only. Plaintiff alleged that she suffered nine months of lingering pain as a result of her soft tissue neck, back and shoulder injuries. Defendant contended that her view of the traffic signal was obstructed by plaintiff’s vehicle and that she (plaintiff) had been driving erratically before she stopped at the intersection. Defendant also disputed the nature and extent of plaintiff’s injury claim. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $833.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Washington v. Roberts, 00CA007839

Three Generations of Family In Fender-Bender

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck and back injuries; body bruising
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $1,200
Case Summary: Plaintiff was driving a vehicle. Her mother, age 60, and two minor children, ages 12 and 15, were passengers. They were also named as plaintiffs in this case. Plaintiffs’ vehicle came to a stop and was subsequently struck in the rear by a vehicle driven by Defendant. Plaintiffs claimed this accident involved a significant impact that resulted in serious soft tissue neck and back injuries to all of them. Defendant contended that his vehicle rolled forward and merely tapped the rear of plaintiffs’ vehicle, causing no property damage. According to defendant, plaintiffs were not injured in this accident. Jury found for plaintiffs for a total of $ 4,800.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Hankey v. Kabel, 2004CA003545B

Victim Delayed Treatment After Minor Accident

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck and back injuries (strains and sprains)
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $3,700
Case Summary: Plaintiff was driving his vehicle. As she slowed down at an intersection, she was struck by defendant’s vehicle from behind in a minor, low speed impact. Details of the accident were not at issue and defendant stipulated to liability. The case proceeded on the question of damages only. Plaintiff alleged that her soft tissue neck and back (strains and sprains) injuries were serious and a direct result of this accident. Defendant contended that: if plaintiff was injured, her injuries were minor; and her complaints were not the result of this accident as evidenced by the fact that plaintiff did not request EMS at the scene and she received no treatment until seven days after the accident. Further, plaintiff was involved in another accident two weeks before this accident. Jury awarded plaintiff $ 3,700.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Hemphill v. Ferrufino, 98CA003049

Defendant Argues that Plaintiff Changed Lanes

Type of Injury: Soft tissue back injury
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $5,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was operating his vehicle south. He was struck in the rear by a vehicle driven by Defendant. Plaintiff alleged that defendant failed to keep a proper lookout and maintain a safe distance. Plaintiff claimed to have sustained a soft tissue back injury as a result of this accident. Defendant contended that plaintiff switched lanes in front of him and cut off his lane of travel. The parties stipulated to damages of $ 5,000 and the case was tried on liability only. The jury found for the plaintiff. As such, plaintiff received $ 5,000 in stipulated damages.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Gause v. Chambers, 2005 CA 004938B

Relevance of Dental Injuries Disputed

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck and back injuries; dental injuries resulting in the loss of teeth
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $5,253
Case Summary: Plaintiff was operating a vehicle and came to a stop in the northbound lane of an Avenue due to traffic. Defendant, who was operating his own vehicle, rear-ended plaintiff’s stopped car. Plaintiff claimed that she suffered soft tissue neck and back injuries which resolved with treatment. She further alleged that she had dental injuries as a result of her mouth hitting the steering wheel, but she did not become aware of the dental injuries until several months after the accident. Defendant contended that the plaintiff came to a sudden stop. Defendant maintained that he applied his brakes and only made light contact with the plaintiff’s vehicle. Defendant further contended that plaintiff’s dental injuries were not related to this accident. Jury returned a plaintiff verdict of $ 5,253.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Chumpitaz v. Bryson, 02CA003771

Subjective Injury Claims from Low-Impact Collision

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck and back injuries
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $5,850
Case Summary: Plaintiff and Defendant were operating their respective vehicles on the same road and in the same direction. They were each traveling at speeds of no more than 10 to 15 mph in rush hour traffic when defendant’s vehicle hit the rear of plaintiff’s vehicle. Plaintiff claimed she sustained soft tissue neck and back injuries. Defendant testified that he hit plaintiff’s vehicle, but did not admit liability. He disputed the nature and extent of plaintiff’s injuries due to the low impact of this collision. The jury awarded plaintiff $ 5,850 after deliberating 2 hours. Per defendant’s counsel, the outcome was most impacted by this being a low speed accident with minor impact. In addition, plaintiff claimed subjective symptoms for which no objective testing was available.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Gillum v. Blake, 2004CA003926

Victim’s Injuries Blamed On Prior Stroke

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck and back injuries
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $6,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was a passenger in a car. The car stalled in a tunnel. The car, which was in the left lane, was struck from behind by a pickup truck driven by Defendant. The force of the impact crushed the rear of the plaintiff’s vehicle. Plaintiff suffered soft tissue neck and back injuries. Defendant argued that; the accident was unavoidable; he was following a truck in the left lane of the tunnel; he went around the slow-moving truck and; when he moved back into the left lane ahead of the truck, he was suddenly confronted with plaintiff’s stalled vehicle. Defendant disputed plaintiff’s damages and claimed that any alleged injuries were due to a minor stroke plaintiff suffered two months prior to this accident. Jury returned a plaintiff verdict of $ 6,000.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Comelli v. Rodger, 01CA005394

Insurer Forced to Pay for Phantom Driver

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck and back injuries
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $6,468
Case Summary: Plaintiff was driving through an intersection when his car was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by Defendant. Defendant argued successfully that his vehicle was first struck from the rear by another vehicle which fled the scene. The impact forced defendant’s vehicle into the rear of plaintiff’s vehicle. Defendant was named as a third party defendant when plaintiff brought claims for uninsured motorist benefits against his carrier, Defendant 2. Plaintiff argued that his soft tissue neck and back injuries were the direct result of the collision. Defendant2 contended there was no phantom vehicle. Defendant did not appear for trial, but the police officer testified as to evidentiary findings of a third vehicle at the scene. Jury found the phantom driver 100% responsible for this accident, awarding plaintiff $ 6,468.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Robinson v. Williams, 2005CA004977

At-Fault Driver Caught After Hit-And-Run

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck and back injuries
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $10,290
Case Summary: Plaintiff was driving during evening rush hour. She stopped her car at an intersection, which was controlled by a traffic light. While stopped, she was rear-ended by another vehicle. That vehicle fled the scene, but was later identified as belonging to Defendant, who admitted causing the accident. An independent witness corroborated the hit-and-run nature of the accident. Plaintiff had a trailer hitch on the back of her vehicle and claimed the hitch was damaged and absorbed the force of impact. Plaintiff argued that her soft tissue cervical and lumbar injuries were the direct result of this impact. Defendant contended that this minimal impact accident did not cause a serious injury. He argued that, if plaintiff was injured, her complaints were minor and she should have recovered quickly. A jury awarded plaintiff $ 10,290 after deliberating 1 hour.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Russell v. Mahamadou, 2007CA000758B

Rear-End Crash Caused By Vehicle Attempting to Pass

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck injuries resulting in headaches
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $11,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was driving his vehicle. He claimed a vehicle driven by defendant attempted to pass on his left over the midline and hit him in the rear-end. Defendant argued that plaintiff attempted a U-turn in the middle of the street, thereby causing the accident. Plaintiff suffered soft tissue neck injuries in the accident when he struck his head on a side window. He was wearing his seatbelt at the time. Plaintiff claimed the accident was 100% the fault of defendant and his injuries were directly attributable to this accident. Defendant disputed liability for the accident and also contested the extent of the injuries plaintiff claimed. Jury found for plaintiff, awarding him $ 11,000.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Higginbottom v. Shaarawi, 99ca005860

Moderate Injury Case Examples

Moderate accident injuries include more extensive soft tissue injuries, simple bone fractures, herniated or slipped discs, and some concussions. Moderate injury victims may be out of work for several weeks or months, and may be left with lingering effects from the injuries.

Defendant Disputes Extent of Victim’s Injuries

Type of Injury: Neck injury-herniated cervical disc; shoulder impingement syndrome
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $15,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was driving and had stopped her vehicle in traffic at an intersection. A large truck owned by Defendant and driven by one of defendant’s employees was directly behind plaintiff. Defendant truck driver rear-ended plaintiff’s vehicle. Damage to plaintiff’s vehicle was largely due to the size of defendants’ truck, rather than the speed at which the accident occurred. Plaintiff claimed that she suffered herniated cervical disc and shoulder impingement syndrome as a direct result of this accident, which would require future surgery. Defendants did not contest liability and acknowledged that plaintiff may have required treatment for soft tissue injuries for three to four months after the accident. However, defendants argued that plaintiff’s continuing complaints preexisted the accident and any need for future surgery was unrelated to this accident. Jury awarded plaintiff $ 15,000.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Whyte v. James Parreco & Son , 03CA002559

Case Settles After Failed Mediation Attempt

Type of Injury: Back and neck injuries-cervical and lumbar strain injuries that resulted in chronic neck pain
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $18,500
Case Summary: Plaintiff was traveling directly in front of a vehicle driven by Defendant. Defendant’s car collided with the rear of plaintiff’s vehicle when plaintiff slowed her vehicle for traffic. Plaintiff claimed to have suffered substantial cervical and lumbar strain injuries that resulted in chronic neck pain. Defendant disputed liability and damages. Defendant contended plaintiff backed into his vehicle while he was stopped for traffic and claimed plaintiff’s injuries were not caused by the minimal impact collision. Defendant noted that plaintiff; sustained a back injury from a severe motor vehicle accident several years earlier; and she also complained to her supervisor that she sustained a back injury at work five months before the subject accident. The case settled prior to trial for $18,500 after a failed mediation attempt.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Jones v. Heflin, 2005 CA 009533B

Award for Less Than Plaintiff Sought

Type of Injury: Neck injury-herniated cervical disc
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $19,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was driving his vehicle and had stopped for a traffic light when he was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by Defendant. Plaintiff claimed he suffered a herniated cervical disc which required an interior fusion as a direct result of this accident. Plaintiff claimed permanent residual pain and sought $ 30,000 in medicals and lost wages. Defendant claimed that she was pushed into the rear of plaintiff’s vehicle by an unidentified driver. Defendant also disputed the nature and extent of plaintiff’s injury and argued that he had recovered. A Superior Court jury found for plaintiff, awarding him $19,000 in damages.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Epps v. White, 01CA007475

Defendant Argues Victim Was Not In Vehicle

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck, back and knee injuries
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $25,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was in his parked vehicle alongside a city street. Defendant driver approached from the rear and could not stop in time to avoid a collision with plaintiff’s vehicle. Plaintiff alleged soft tissue neck, back and knee injuries as a result of the accident. Defendant contended that: plaintiff was not in his vehicle at the time of the accident; pedestrians were standing in the street when another vehicle approached from the opposite direction; he took defensive action by turning to his right to avoid striking pedestrians or the oncoming car; his actions were reasonable; and plaintiff was not injured as he was not in his car at the time of impact. Prior to trial, the parties agreed to damages of $ 25,000 (policy limits).
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Fullard v. Montague, 99ca007286

Judge Issues Award at Bench Trial

Type of Injury: Neck injury-herniated cervical disc at C5-C6
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $25,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was driving her vehicle and stopped for a red light at an intersection. While stopped, plaintiff was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by Defendant, who admitted liability for the accident. Plaintiff sustained a herniated cervical disc at C5-C6 as a result of the accident, but sought minimal treatment. Alternatively, plaintiff argued that the accident aggravated a previously asymptomatic neck injury. Defendant disputed that plaintiff’s injury was caused by this accident as she had pre existing degenerative changes in her neck. In a bench trial, the judge determined a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $ 25,000.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Pugh v. Dews, 01CA003662

Plaintiff’s Award Reduced to Policy Limits

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck and back injuries
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $25,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was stopped at a stop sign. Another vehicle was stopped directly behind plaintiff. A third vehicle, operated by an uninsured motorist, rear-ended the second vehicle, forcing it into the rear of plaintiff’s vehicle. Plaintiff pursued this case against Defendant under her uninsured motorist coverage. Plaintiff alleged that the uninsured driver failed to keep an assured clear distance and that she suffered significant soft tissue neck and back injuries as a direct result of this accident. Defendant contended that plaintiff’s injuries were exaggerated and were not proximately related to this accident. Plaintiff had been involved in an accident three years prior to this accident and defendant contended that plaintiff had substantial pre existing injuries as a result of the previous accident. Plaintiff’s award of $ 30,000 was reduced to policy limits of $ 25,000.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Melton v. Allstate, 97CA009296

Jury Swayed By Permanency of Knee Injury

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck and back, Knee injury-cartilage damage
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $50,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff and defendant were operating their respective vehicles on the same road and in the same direction. Plaintiff came to a stop and was subsequently rear-ended by defendant. Defendant admitted liability and the case proceeded on the issue of damages only. Plaintiff alleged that he suffered a permanent cartilage damage in knee requiring significant arthroscopic surgery and resulting in the inability to apply weight to the knee as a direct result of this accident. Defendant contended that plaintiff was exaggerating the nature and extent of his injuries. Jury awarded plaintiff $50,000 in damages. Per plaintiff’s counsel, the permanency of plaintiff’s injury and his continuing knee problems had an impact on the outcome.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Baah v. Holt, 98CA005726

Lacerations, Concussion and Soft Tissue Injuries

Type of Injury: Head injury-Laceration to top of head; severe headaches; soft tissue neck and lower back strain; concussion
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $55,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff and defendant were operating their respective vehicles on the same road and in the same direction. Plaintiff stopped to make a left turn and was subsequently rear-ended by defendant. Liability was admitted and the case proceeded on the issue of damages only. Plaintiff alleged that he suffered significant injuries, including laceration to top of head, severe headaches, soft tissue neck and lower back strain and concussion as a direct result of this accident. Defendant contended that plaintiff was exaggerating the nature and extent of his injuries. Jury awarded plaintiff $55,000 in damages.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Hawkins v. Siler, 98CA-002942

Tractor-Trailer Driver and Owner Found Liable

Type of Injury: Neck and back injuries; a concussion and migraine headaches
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $70,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff, who was operating her vehicle, came to a stop and was rear-ended by Defendant’s semi tractor-trailer. Defendant was the self-employed owner/operator of the truck and admitted he struck plaintiff’s vehicle, causing a scraped bumper. Plaintiff claimed the impact caused neck and back injuries, a concussion and migraine headaches. The claims proceeded to trial on the issues of causation and damages. Plaintiff alleged she sustained serious injuries as a direct result of this accident. She maintained that her migraine headaches did not resolve until a year post-accident and she had continuing neck and back pain. Defendant acknowledged that plaintiff may have sustained minor neck and back injuries, but those injuries should have resolved in a short period of time. Jury awarded plaintiff $70,000.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Fowler v. Haghanegi, 2006CA005936B

Gap in Treatment for Orthopedic Injuries

Type of Injury: Bilateral shoulder, neck and lower back injuries
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $75,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was operating an SUV. He came to a stop at a red light. Defendant, who was operating a vehicle owned by Defendant 2, struck the vehicle directly behind plaintiff, causing the other vehicle to strike the rear of the SUV. Plaintiff was transported from the scene by ambulance. Plaintiff claimed he sustained injuries to his neck, lower back and shoulders as a direct result of this accident. According to plaintiff, his injuries prevented him from continuing to work as an outside sales representative. An orthopedic expert testified that plaintiff had permanent injuries. Defendants admitted liability, but disputed the nature and extent of the injuries claimed by plaintiff. Defendants asserted that plaintiff initially treated for two months following the accident and then had about a nine-month gap in treatment. jury awarded plaintiff $ 75,000 in damages.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Monk v. Redman, 2008CA008609V

Severe Injury Case Examples

Victims of severe car accidents often suffer multiple injuries, including extensive soft-tissue injuries, joint damage requiring surgical repair, complicated fractures, and spinal cord damage.

Severely injured victims may be left with permanent impairments that render them unable to return to their pre-accident activities or employment.

Victim Admits Prior Accident with Similar Injuries

Type of Injury: Soft tissue neck and back injuries
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $100,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff stopped for a red light and was struck from the rear by a vehicle driven by Defendant. Plaintiff claimed he sustained serious neck and back injuries as a direct result of the impact. He acknowledged a prior accident caused similar soft tissue neck and back injuries, but claimed those injuries had resolved. Defendant contended the light turned green and plaintiff started moving then stopped suddenly for no reason, thereby causing the accident. Defendant claimed this was a minor accident and argued that any continuing back and neck complaints plaintiff had were likely from the earlier accident and were unrelated to this event. Jury returned a $ 100,000 verdict for plaintiff.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Parker v. DeMoz, 03CA6448

Plaintiff Required Hip Replacement Surgery

Type of Injury: Soft tissue injuries; hip injury-vascular necrosis
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $125,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff and defendant were operating their respective vehicles on a Freeway. Both parties were in the process of merging when defendant rear-ended plaintiff. Plaintiff alleged that defendant was using his cell phone which distracted him and he failed to stop within an assured clear distance. Further, plaintiff suffered vascular necrosis of the hip as a direct result of this accident, requiring hip replacement surgery. Defendant contended that: he was not distracted by his cell phone; he was unable to stop when a phantom vehicle between plaintiff and defendant suddenly maneuvered into another lane; and plaintiff was exaggerating the nature and extent of her injuries. Jury returned a plaintiff verdict in the amount of $ 125,000.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Adams v. Hunter, 98CA001990

Vehicle Damage Supports Chronic Injury Claim

Type of Injury: Back injury-Aggravation of previous herniated disc in back
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $200,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was stopped at a red light. Defendant skidded on the wet roadway and rear-ended plaintiff’s vehicle. Plaintiff had pre-existing herniated discs and had undergone surgery. Plaintiff alleged that the impact was forceful, bending the heavy bumper on his older model automobile, and he suffered aggravation of his pre-existing injuries in back as a direct result of the accident, requiring insertion of a spinal cord stimulator. Defendants contended that plaintiff suffered minimal injuries and that plaintiff’s surgery was not proximately related to the accident. Jury awarded plaintiff $ 200,000 plus $1,100 costs. Per plaintiff’s counsel, the fact that the heavy bumper on plaintiff’s vehicle sustained significant damage and plaintiff required insertion of a spinal stimulator significantly impacted the outcome.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Shaw v. Richardson, 96CA009304

Tow Truck Driver Liable for Victims Lumbar Injuries

Type of Injury: Soft tissue back injury; aggravation of a preexisting chronic lumbar condition
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $255,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was driving his private vehicle when he was struck in the rear-end by a tow truck driven by an employee of Defendant. The intersection collision resulted in $ 4,500 in damage to plaintiff’s vehicle and he sustained serious soft tissue lumbar injuries. He was off work for 1.5 years and was unable to continue as a sanitation worker and became reemployed as a bus driver. Plaintiff alleged that it was a significant accident which caused him serious aggravation of a preexisting chronic lumbar condition. Plaintiff’s spouse sought damages for loss of consortium. Defendant admitted liability for the accident, but argued that the accident caused plaintiff a temporary exacerbation of his preexisting condition, but that his continuing complaints were unrelated to this accident. Jury awarded plaintiffs $255,000 including $ 50,000 for loss of consortium.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Roderick v. Wrecker, 99ca005533

Victim Settles Crash Case with U.S. Military

Type of Injury: Back injury-Herniated disc at L5-S1
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $325,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was operating her vehicle. She had stopped at a traffic light when she was rear-ended by a vehicle owned by Defendant and operated by a serviceman. Plaintiff claimed that she suffered a herniated disc in her back at L5-S1 requiring laminectomy and future fusion as a direct result of this accident resulting in a permanent disability. Defendant contended that plaintiff was not as injured as claimed as this was a low impact accident and that plaintiff was exaggerating the nature and extent of her injuries. Defendant pointed out that there was a six-month delay before the first surgery. Case settled for $ 325,000 prior to trial. Per plaintiff’s counsel, plaintiff was an excellent witness at her deposition and would have presented well at trial.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Hawkins v. United States of America, 99-1840

Police Cruiser Collision at Car Wash

Type of Injury: Back injury-Exacerbation of pre-existing lumbar (back) spine injury
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $380,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff stopped his automobile at a car wash. Defendant’s police officer, who was directly behind plaintiff, placed his police cruiser in park with the motor running. The police officer attempted to pick his cell phone from under the seat when he lost his balance, grabbed the steering wheel and put the cruiser into “drive”. The cruiser moved forward and struck plaintiff’s car. Plaintiff claimed he suffered exacerbation of a pre-existing lumbar (back) spine injury causing severe, constant debilitating pain. Plaintiff claimed $ 9,469 in medical specials and approximately $ 360,000 in lost income. Defendant disputed both liability and causation. Jury returned a plaintiff verdict for $ 465,661. Defendant filed a Notice of Appeal. Thereafter, the parties agreed to a settlement in the amount of $ 380,000.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Fleming v. District of Columbia, 4732-86

D.C. School Bus Driver Runs Stop Sign

Type of Injury: Neck injury-cervical disc damage
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $400,000
Case Summary: As plaintiff drove westbound, a northbound school bus owned by defendant and operated by defendant’s employee failed to stop at a stop sign and collided with plaintiff’s vehicle. Plaintiff sustained cervical disc damage which resulted in spinal nerve encroachment which required cervical fusion surgery. Plaintiff claimed that defendant’s driver was negligent in that he failed to yield the right-of-way, failed to reduce his vehicle’s speed to avoid the accident, and failed to remain stopped at a stop sign until it was safe to enter the intersection. Defendant denied liability, and claimed plaintiff’s claimed injuries and damages were caused by his own contributory negligence and/or assumption of the risk. Jury determined defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of injury to plaintiff, and awarded plaintiff $400,000 for his damages.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Simms v. District of Columbia, 2012-CA-000959-V

Postal Worker Driving Mail Truck Liable for Crash

Type of Injury: Knee injury-lateral meniscus tear of his right knee; back injury- herniated disc at L1-L2
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $450,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff motorist, was stopped when his vehicle was struck from behind by Defendant’s mail truck. The truck was being driven by defendant’s employee at the time of the accident. Defendant admitted liability for the accident and the case proceeded to a bench trial on damages only. Plaintiff alleged that he sustained a lateral meniscus tear of his right knee which required arthroscopic surgical repair. He also claimed a herniated disc at L1-L2. Defendant contended that plaintiff’s back injury was due to a pre existing degenerative condition. However, plaintiff maintained that there was no evidence of any pre existing injuries or complaints to support defendant’s contentions. Judge awarded plaintiff $ 450,000: $ 395,000 for pain and suffering; $ 33,000 for past medical expenses; $ 18,000 for future medical expenses; and $ 4,000 for property damage.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Ndbosi v. United States of America, 1:02 CV 02145TPJ

Commercial Truck Driver and Employer Both Liable for Accident

Type of Injury: Neck injury-three ruptured discs in her cervical spine
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $600,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff and Defendant’s employee were traveling in the same direction. Defendant’s employee rear-ended plaintiff’s vehicle while plaintiff was stopped at a red light. Defendant admitted liability and the trial proceeded on the issue(s) of proximate cause and/or damages. Plaintiff alleged that she suffered three ruptured discs in her cervical spine in the collision. She claimed about $ 12,000 in past medical, $ 30,000 in future medical and $ 2,000 in lost income. Defendant contended that plaintiff was exaggerating the extent of her damages. Jury awarded plaintiff $ 600,000 in damages.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Wright v. Superior Beverages, INC, 99-07094

High-Impact Collision Leaves Victim Paralyzed

Type of Injury: Back injuries-Paraplegia as a result of spinal cord injuries
Type of Accident: Rear-end
Award/Settlement Amount: $1,500,000
Case Summary: Plaintiff was driving his vehicle. He had come to a stop at an intersection after he had tapped the rear of the vehicle in front of him in a very minor accident. As plaintiff was attempting to unbuckle his seatbelt in order to get out of his car, he was struck from the rear by a vehicle driven by Defendant. The second impact was much more significant than the first. Plaintiff claimed he suffered paralyzing spinal injuries as a result of the second impact. An eyewitness to the accident corroborated plaintiff’s version of events. The parties did not dispute plaintiff’s injuries. Defendant contended that plaintiff suffered his paralysis when he struck the vehicle in front of him. Jury found for plaintiff, awarding him $1,500,000.
Location: District of Columbia
Case Name and Docket Number: Park v. Bushong, 00ca001281

Methodology

We analyzed a group of Washington D.C. lawsuits filed by plaintiffs injured in vehicle accidents. Plaintiffs include drivers and passengers, and all were injured in rear-end collisions. All plaintiffs in the group received a final payout from a court award or settlement.

Two car accident cases are lawsuits against the plaintiff’s own insurance company, seeking a fair uninsured motorist payout.

In cases with more than one plaintiff, the Award amount reflects the base payout paid to one individual plaintiff.

Cases include collisions involving cars, tractor-trailers, commercial trucks, and government vehicles, with injuries ranging from soft-tissue bumps and bruises to a paralyzing spinal cord injury.